![]() ![]() Anthrax is a bacterial disease that usually comes from infected animals or animal products, but Phil was always careful never to expose himself. ![]() Here’s our take on the movie’s twist ending and the true meaning of the title.Īt the end of the movie, Phil is dead, and his likely cause of death? Anthrax. And so the movie’s title, The Power of the Dog, refers to those dark, secret selves we fear, and what happens when they surface. Caught up in this act, Phil’s fatal flaw is his inability to really see himself, or Peter, clearly. And The Power of the Dog is ultimately a story about how toxic masculinity is a corrosive force that destroys people from the inside-because men like Phil who work so hard to perform an inauthentic idea of a “real man” end up becoming their own greatest victims. Jane Campion’s movie, based on Thomas Savage’s semi-autobiographical 1967 novel, challenges the classic “cowboy myth,” drawing out a latent homoeroticism in the Western Genre. But the ending tells us that it’s Peter who’s actually been in control, as he’s orchestrated a meticulous plan to kill Phil using anthrax-infected hides. For most of the story, savagely cruel rancher Phil is the most dominant character, terrorizing his new sister-in-law Rose and her sensitive son Peter. Who really holds the “power” in The Power of the Dog? The movie’s ending reveals it isn’t who we’d think. Jane Campion’s movie – based on Thomas Savage’s semi-autobiographical 1967 novel – challenges the classic “cowboy myth,” drawing out a latent homoeroticism in the Western Genre. Who really holds the “power” in The Power of the Dog? The film’s ending reveals it isn’t who we’d think.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |